Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Max Julian thesis defense

Congratulations to BSL Master's student Max Julian (aka Massimo Iuliano :-), on the (very) successful defense of his thesis, "Illustration-Inspired Visualization of Blood Flow Dynamics".  Thanks to Nick Woolridge and Mark Chignell, Max's thesis examiners, and a special shout out to my colleague and Max's co-supervisor, Peter Coppin from OCADU, whose creativity, drive, enthusiasm, and optimism in the face of adversity have made this art/science collaboration possible and successful.

KVS wins award at ECI conference

Congratulations to BSL alumnus Kristian Valen-Sendstad (affectionately known as KVS), who won an Outstanding Oral Presentation by a Young Scientist award at the 2nd ECI Conference on CFD in Medicine and Biology, for his invited talk "On the assumption of laminar flow in the cerebrovasculature: Implications for CFD insights into aneurysm initiation and rupture".

Yours truly was a co-chair of the conference, but was not involved in the judging, and didn't even know who the judges were!

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

An entertaining take on peer review

Please take a moment to read (if time and your library access allows) this letter to the editor from Bob Mulkern, on the subject of peer-review.  Wish I could post full text, but then there are those pesky copyright issues :-)

Monday, June 22, 2015

Student awards, SB3C 2015

Congratulations to BSL PhD student Muhammad Owais Khan, whose presentation "CFD simulation of transition to turbulence for Newtonian vs. non-Newtonian flow through a stenosis" won first prize at the Biotransport and Simulation PhD student competition of the 2015 Summer Biomechanics, Bioengineering, and Biotransport Conference in Snowbird, Utah. Here Owais is shown with proud co-authors Frank Loth, yours truly (with exit sign), Kristian Valen-Sendstad aka KVS, and some random guy in the background.

Congratulations also to BSL PhD student Resmi KrishnankuttyRema, whose presentation "Inlet flow rate variation and onset of flow instabilities in the carotid siphon" was  a finalist for the Biofluids PhD student competition.  Like Owais, Resmi knocked it out of the park with her talk, but faced some stiff competition.  Well done both!

Sunday, December 28, 2014

Making the case for basic science research

I can't say I was ever a huge fan of Neil deGrasse Tyson, but now I am. His clever (and accurate) tweets about winter solstice rituals aside, watch this interview, where he patiently, er, 'unpacks' Fareed Zakaria and the CNN viewership regarding the importance of basic science research.  And all without screed; just deft sardonicism.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Minding the Gap

Apologies for the long absence, but professional and personal commitments keep me distracted from (other) writing. Nevertheless, I wanted to share some very good news about some recent work published in AJNR.

First, people are sitting up and taking notice of our "Mind the Gap" paper.  It has been featured in the December 2014 AJNR Digest, and also a special collection of articles called "Aneurysms and the American Journal of Neuroradiology: The Next 20 Years", which as its eye candy features a figure from our paper (see right).

Congratulations to Kristian Valen-Sendstad, whose tireless (and often, er, turbulent) efforts to promote good practice in aneurysm CFD appear to be paying off.

Second, congratulations to PhD student Owais Khan, whose first journal article, a follow-up to "Mind the Gap", was recently accepted by AJNR. Here's a preview:

Narrowing the Expertise Gap for Predicting Intracranial Aneurysm Hemodynamics: Impact of Solver Numerics vs. Mesh and Time-step Resolution
M. Owais Khan, Kristian Valen-Sendstad, David A. Steinman

Background: Recent high-resolution computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies have uncovered the presence of laminar flow instabilities and possible transitional or turbulent flow in some intracranial aneurysms.  The purpose of this study was to elucidate requirements for CFD to be able to detect these complex flows, and in particular to discriminate the impact of solver numerics vs. mesh and time-step resolution.
Methods: We focused on three MCA aneurysms, exemplifying highly unstable, mildly unstable, or stable flow phenotypes, respectively. For each, the number of mesh elements was varied by 320x, and the number of time steps by 25x. CFD simulations were carried out using an optimized second-order, minimally dissipative solver, and a more typical first-order, stabilized solver.
Results: With the optimized solver and settings, qualitative differences in flow and wall shear stress patterns were negligible for models down to ~800,000 tetrahedra and ~5000 time steps per cardiac cycle, and could be solved within clinically acceptable timeframes. At the same model resolutions, however, the stabilized solver had poorer accuracy, and completely suppressed flow instabilities for the two unstable flow cases. These findings were verified using the popular commercial CFD solver, Fluent.
Conclusions:  Solver  numerics must be considered at least as important as mesh and time-step resolution in determining the quality of aneurysm CFD simulations. Proper CFD verification studies, and not just superficial grid refinements, are therefore required in order to avoid overlooking potentially clinically- and biologically-relevant flow features.